Acridine

(Last updated 26 March 2024)

Embedded image

Figure . The molecular diagram of acridine.

CSP studies

REFCODEACRDIN
FormulaC13 H9 N1
Common NameAcridine
IUPAC Systematic NameAcridine
Other NamesAcridine
CSD RefcodesACRDIN04, ACRDIN07, ACRDIN08, ACRDIN02, ACRDIN05, ACRDIN06, ACRDIN12
ScientistLouise Price / Einat Schur (Rui Guo)
Date2010
PublicationSchur, E.; Bernstein, J.; Price, L. S.; Guo, R.; Price, S. L.; Lapidus, S. H.; Stephens, P. W., Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 9, (18), 4884-4893. DOI: Open paper (10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00557)
Search identifierA
Energy model1
Study_ID0
ProgramsMOLPAK, DMACRYS_2.0.4 (on CONDOR)
Location on S Drive\\CHEMISTRY_CPOSS\\Acridine\\ACRDIN_CONDOR
Potential DescriptionMP2 6-31G(d,p) DMA +FIT
Search identifierB
Energy model1 (published)
Study_ID20
ProgramsCrystalPredictor_v_unknown, DMACRYS_2.0.4
Location on S Drive\\CHEMISTRY_CPOSS\\Acridine\\ACRDIN_CP
Potential DescriptionCrystalPredictor + MP2 6-31G(d,p) DMA +FIT
Energy model2
Study_ID21
ProgramsStudy_ID=20, DMACRYS (2.3.1.1)
Location on S Drive/CHEMISTRY_CPOSS/Acridine/ACRDIN_DFT
Potential DescriptionCrystalPredictor + MP2 6-31G(d,p) DMA +FIT

Embedded image

Figure . (Top) crystal energy landscape of Acridine from Study_ID=20. (Bottom left) crystal energy landscape of Acridine from Study_ID=0. (Bottom right) relative energies by method of key structures.

Although DFT+D energies for Study_ID=20 have been calculated, there are no molecular energies so the lattice energies are not included in the spreadsheet.

CSD structures (CSD version 5.44 with Apr 2023 update)

Table . Crystallographic information for CSD entries for Acridine. Different polymorphs are coloured differently.

REFCODEspace groupZ’a / Åb / Åc / Åα / °β / °γ / °density / g cm-3Form
ACRDINP21/a216.29218.8316.0729095.07901.283III
ACRDIN01P21/n111.375(3)5.988(3)13.647(3)9098.97901.296II
ACRDIN02Aa220.0405.95016.37090110.63901.303V
ACRDIN03P212121315.61029.3406.2209090901.254IV
ACRDIN04P21/n111.253(1)5.951(<1)13.602(1)9099.53(<1)901.325II
ACRDIN05Cc26.174(2)23.497(8)12.868(4)9096.48(<1)901.284VI
ACRDIN06P21/n26.057(1)22.813(4)13.204(2)9095.94(<1)901.312VII
ACRDIN07P21/c26.069(<1)18.818(<1)16.283(<1)9095.16(<1)901.285III
ACRDIN08P21212136.179(<1)15.719(1)29.312(3)9090901.254IV
ACRDIN09P21/c23.047(7)18.800(20)16.200(19)9095.23(1)901.327III
ACRDIN10P21/c26.028(7)18.760(20)16.171(19)9095.18(1)901.372III
ACRDIN11P21/n111.183(5)5.934(1)13.590(4)9099.84(4)901.34IX
ACRDIN12P21/n111.285(<1)12.382(<1)6.679(<1)9092.06(<1)901.276IX
ACRDIN13P21/c26.070(<1)18.847(3)16.304(3)9095.21(<1)901.282III

The two polymorphs designated Form IX are definitely not the same polymorph.

Table . Experimental information for CSD entries for Acridine.

REFCODEspace groupR factorT / KYearComments
ACRDINP21/a14.6RT1960Crystallization conditions not reported
ACRDIN01P21/n13.3RT1956Crystallization conditions not reported
ACRDIN02AaRT1955Crystallization conditions not reported
ACRDIN03P212121RT1955Crystallization conditions not reported
ACRDIN04P21/n3.811852004Crystallization from DMF or 1:1 EtOH:MeOH mixture1
ACRDIN05Cc4.031872004Template-assisted crystallization1
ACRDIN06P21/n5.731852004Template-assisted crystallization1
ACRDIN07P21/c4.72RT2010(Recrystallization from EtOH, ACN, THF, dioxane, toluene yields form II)
Recrystallization from DCM or ethyeneglycoldimethyl ether2
ACRDIN08P2121215.24RT2010Recrystallization from DMSO2
ACRDIN09P21/c3.631732012Recrystallization from ethanol (not sure how to get it phase pure, or when it crystallizes concomitantly with II or IV)3
ACRDIN10P21/c7.091732012Recrystallization from ethanol (not sure how to get it phase pure, or when it crystallizes concomitantly with II or IV)3
ACRDIN11P21/n20.581002015Solvent-assisted grinding4
ACRDIN12P21/n4.11RT2019Slow evaporation from toluene5
ACRDIN13P21/c7.83RT2022Sublimation6

II, III, IV, IX all grown from solution. VI, VII grown by template assisted solvent crystallization.

The heat of fusion rule shows that II and III are enantiotropically related, and III and IX are enantiotropically related. However, we cannot conclude from experiment whether II or IX is the most stable low temperature form.7

Other notes

1. X. F. Mei and C. Wolf, Crystal Growth & Design, 2004, 4, 1099-1103.

2. D. Braga, F. Grepioni, L. Maini, P. P. Mazzeo and K. Rubini, Thermochimica Acta, 2010, 507-508, 1-8.

3. A. Kupka, V. Vasylyeva, D. Hofmann, K. V. Yusenko and K. Merz, Crystal Growth & Design, 2012, 12, 5966-5971.

4. M. Lusi, I. J. Vitorica-Yrezabal and M. J. Zaworotko, Crystal Growth & Design, 2015, 15, 4098-4103.

5. P. W. Stephens, E. Schur, S. H. Lapidus and J. Bernstein, Acta Crystallographica Section E, 2019, 75, 489-491.

6. S. Wang, Y. Shen, X. Zhang, H. Liu, S.-T. Zhang, W. Li and B. Yang, Dyes and Pigments, 2022, 205, 110527.

7. E. Schur, J. Bernstein, L. S. Price, R. Guo, S. L. Price, S. H. Lapidus and P. W. Stephens, Crystal Growth & Design, 2019, 9, 4884-4893.

Dataset downloads